CO20220942

1. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that his associate D.C., while under his supervision, provided timely, conscientious, and diligent services and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.
2. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to promptly disclose a material error to his client and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.
3. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to obtain instructions from his client and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.
4. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to provide competent, conscientious, and diligent services to his client by failing to submit an Affidavit in support of an Appeal of the dismissal of his client’s claim and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.
5. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to be candid with the Court and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.

CO20191233

1. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to issue and serve the Statement of Claim of T.C. prior to the expiry of the limitation period and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
2. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to promptly disclose a material error to his client contrary to section 7.7-1 of the Code of Conduct and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
3. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz improperly amended a Statement of Claim of a former client and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
4. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to comply with the Rules of Court and the Code of Conduct in serving an Amended Statement of Claim and that such conduct is deserving of sanction; and
5. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to promptly notify his insurer or other indemnitor of the missed limitation date on T.C.’s file, as required by section 7.7 – 2 of the Code of Conduct, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.

CO20210744

1. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz scheduled a Judicial Dispute Resolution without his client’s knowledge and contrary to his client’s instructions and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.
2. It is alleged that Martin G. Schulz failed to provide reasonable notice of his withdrawal from representation of his client and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.