Douglas Hodgson

Hearings

HEARING OUTCOME : Douglas Hodgson

Conduct

2017/02/08

Hearing Report

 

CO20132544

 

  1. It is alleged that you failed to follow your client FLM’s instructions;
  2. It is alleged that you facilitated your client WC to achieve an improper purpose;
  3. It is alleged that you acted improperly while in a conflict of interest position;
  4. It is alleged that you failed to provide competent legal services to your client T.K.;
  5. It is alleged that you failed to be honest and candid with your client FNF;
  6. It is alleged that you failed to provide competent service to your client FNF;
  7. It is alleged that you failed to follow the instructions of your client FNF;
  8. It is alleged that you acted while in a conflict of interest;
  9. It is alleged that you failed to provide competent legal services to your clients BM and N-B;
  10. It is alleged that you failed to follow the instructions of your client N-B;
  11. It is alleged that you failed to follow the instructions of your client EC;
  12. It is alleged that you failed to follow the instructions of your lender client CF;
  13. It is alleged that you failed to provide competent legal services to your client EC;
  14. It is alleged that you failed to follow instructions of your lender client TD;
  15. It is alleged that you failed to provided competent legal services to your client TD;
  16. It is alleged that you failed to respond in a timely manner to correspondence from your client TD;
  17. It is alleged that you failed to provide competent legal services to your clients RM & TM;
  18. It is alleged that you failed to properly supervise your employees;
  19. It is alleged that you participated in an improper scheme to deceive a third party, and lied to or misled another lawyer;
  20. It is alleged that you failed to respond promptly to communications by another lawyer;
  21. It is alleged that you failed to respond and report to your lender client AHL in a timely manner;
  22. It is alleged that you failed to properly supervise your employees;
  23. It is alleged that you failed to respond in a timely manner to correspondence from another solicitor;
  24. It is alleged that you failed to properly supervise your employees.

Notices