CO20172539

1. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to respond in a timely manner to communications from another lawyer, M.M., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
2. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
3. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk breached an undertaking to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
4. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk signed a Consent Order on behalf of his client, S.K.,    without proper instructions and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

CO20190014

5. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to serve his client, ASL, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
6. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
7. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk breached an undertaking to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

CO20190044

8. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly meet financial obligations in relation to his practice, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
9. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to respond in a timely manner to communications from another professional, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
10. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
11. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk breached an undertaking to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

CO20190968

12. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to serve his client, J.G., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
13. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk acted while in a conflict or potential conflict of interest without obtaining the consent of his client, J.G. or in circumstances where it was not in the best interest of J.G. that he do so, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
14. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to obtain instructions from his client, J.G., on all matters not falling within his express or implied authority and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
15. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to be candid with his client, J.G., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
16. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
17. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk breached an undertaking to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

CO20191450

18. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to comply with Rule 119.34 and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
19. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;
20. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk breached an undertaking to promptly respond to and cooperate with the Law Society of Alberta and the such conduct is deserving of sanction; and

CO20191684

21. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to promptly meet financial obligations in relation to his practice, and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.

HE20170205

1. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to serve his clients, l.W., P.B. and U.Z., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

2. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to respond promptly and completely to communications from the Law Society and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

3. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to cooperate with a Law Society investigation and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

4. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to be candid with his client, U.Z., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

5. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk signed a Consent Order on behalf of his client, U.Z. without instructions and that such conduct is deserving of sanction;

6. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to respond in a timely manner to communications from another lawyer, N.L., and that such conduct is deserving of sanction; and

7. It is alleged that David W. Kobylnyk failed to comply with the Law Society’s trust accounting rules and that such conduct is deserving of sanction.